Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope of the Journal "Advancing Islamic Thought in Education Journal"

Focus:
"Advancing Islamic Thought in Education Journal" is dedicated to exploring and advancing the integration of Islamic principles, philosophies, and methodologies in the field of education. The journal focuses on how Islamic thought can contribute to the development of educational theories, practices, policies, and systems in both contemporary and historical contexts. It aims to create an interdisciplinary space for scholars, educators, and researchers to engage with the relationship between Islam and education, highlighting the evolving nature of Islamic thought in educational settings.

Scope:
The scope of the journal encompasses a wide range of topics related to Islamic thought and its application in education, including, but not limited to:

1. Islamic Pedagogies and Teaching Methods:
   Research on Islamic educational methodologies, including the integration of classical and modern approaches in curriculum design, teaching techniques, and assessment strategies.

2. Islamic Education Systems:
   Studies on the historical and contemporary development of Islamic education systems, including Islamic schools, madrasahs, universities, and other institutions of learning across the globe.

3. Philosophies of Islamic Education:
   Articles examining the philosophical foundations of Islamic education, exploring key figures, historical movements, and the theoretical underpinnings that shape Islamic approaches to learning and knowledge.

4. Curriculum Development:
   Research on how Islamic values and principles can inform curriculum content, structure, and delivery in various educational contexts, from early childhood to higher education.

5. Islamic Values and Ethics in Education:
   Exploration of the role of Islamic ethics, morality, and values in shaping educational environments and practices, promoting the development of holistic, character-driven education.

6. Islamic Educational Leadership and Administration:
   Investigations into the leadership models within Islamic education institutions, focusing on strategies for effective administration, management, and leadership that align with Islamic teachings.

7. Comparative Studies in Islamic Education:
   Comparative analyses of Islamic educational models with other global educational systems, highlighting similarities, differences, challenges, and opportunities for cross-cultural learning.

8. Islamic Thought in Contemporary Education:
   Discussions on the relevance and application of Islamic thought in the context of modern-day educational challenges, including globalization, technology integration, and social change.

9. Research and Innovation in Islamic Education:
   Studies examining innovative approaches to Islamic education, including the use of technology, digital tools, and new pedagogical strategies to enhance teaching and learning in Islamic contexts.

10. Islamic Educational Policy and Reform:
    Articles addressing educational policy, reform initiatives, and strategies for improving the quality and accessibility of Islamic education, both locally and globally.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Review Policy of "Advancing Islamic Thought in Education Journal"

The "Advancing Islamic Thought in Education Journal" follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality and academic integrity of the articles it publishes. The review policy is designed to maintain high standards of scholarship, while also promoting fairness, objectivity, and constructive feedback for authors. Below are the key elements of the journal’s review policy:

1. Peer Review Process:

• All submitted manuscripts are subject to double-blind peer review, meaning that both the authors and the reviewers are anonymous to each other throughout the review process.
• The editorial team ensures that all submissions are reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the subject matter of the manuscript.
• Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in Islamic education, pedagogy, philosophy, and related fields.

2. Initial Screening:

• Upon submission, manuscripts are first screened by the editorial team to ensure they align with the journal's focus and scope.
• Articles that do not meet the journal’s standards in terms of relevance or scholarly contribution may be rejected at this stage.
• If a manuscript passes the initial screening, it is sent for peer review.

3. Reviewer Responsibilities:

• Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
  • Originality: The manuscript offers new insights or contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
  • Clarity and Structure: The paper is well-written, logically organized, and follows the journal's guidelines.
  • Relevance and Significance: The research contributes meaningfully to the field of Islamic education.
  • Methodology: The research methodology is sound and appropriate for the study.
  • Use of Sources: The manuscript appropriately engages with relevant literature and sources.
  • Contribution to the Field: The article offers value to scholars, educators, or policymakers in the field of Islamic education.
• Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work, as well as a recommendation for publication (accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject).

4. Author Responsibilities:

• Authors must ensure that their submissions are original, have not been previously published elsewhere, and are not under review by another journal at the same time.
• Authors should provide all necessary citations and acknowledge the work of others to avoid plagiarism.
• If revisions are required following peer review, authors must submit a revised manuscript that addresses the reviewers' comments. Authors are encouraged to provide a response letter outlining the changes made to the manuscript.
• Authors must adhere to the journal’s submission guidelines regarding formatting, referencing style, and ethical standards.

5. Decision and Feedback:

• After receiving the peer reviews, the editorial team makes a final decision on the manuscript. The decisions are as follows:
  • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication without further changes.
  • Minor Revisions: The manuscript is accepted pending minor revisions as suggested by the reviewers.
  • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant revisions before it can be reconsidered for publication.
  • Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.
• The editor will provide detailed feedback to the author based on the reviewers' evaluations. Authors are expected to address the feedback thoroughly in their revised submission.

6. Confidentiality and Ethics:

• All manuscripts, reviewer reports, and editorial communications are kept strictly confidential.
• Reviewers are asked to provide unbiased and constructive critiques and avoid conflicts of interest.
• Authors must adhere to the ethical standards of research, including proper treatment of participants (if applicable), ethical use of data, and adherence to research integrity principles.

7. Publication Ethics:

• The journal adheres to a strict policy against plagiarism, data fabrication, and duplicate publication. Any manuscripts found to involve unethical practices will be rejected and may be reported to the author’s affiliated institution.
• The journal follows the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines to handle cases of misconduct, including issues related to plagiarism, authorship disputes, and research ethics violations.

8. Revisions and Resubmissions:

• Authors who are asked to revise their manuscripts must submit their revised papers within the given timeframe.
• If the revisions are substantial, the manuscript may go through another round of peer review.
• In cases where authors are unable to meet the journal's revision deadlines, they should notify the editorial team in advance and request an extension.

9. Final Decision:

• The editorial team makes the final decision regarding publication based on the peer reviewers’ feedback, revisions by the authors, and the overall quality of the manuscript.
• Once accepted, the manuscript is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the journal

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.